IDENTIFYING GAPS AND NEEDS IN ENGLISH TEACHING PRACTICES FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE KURIKULUM MERDEKA AT SMA NEGERI 3 NGABANG
Abstract
This study aims to identify the gaps and needs in implementing the Kurikulum Merdeka in English language teaching at the senior high school level. A qualitative method was employed, with data collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. The findings reveal several key gaps, including limited learning facilities, insufficient teacher understanding of the curriculum and differentiated assessment, low student engagement and readiness, and challenges in aligning assessments with Learning Outcomes. Additionally, the use of technology and teacher training remain suboptimal. This study recommends targeted professional development, improved access to learning resources, and stronger institutional support to ensure the effective implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka.
References
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Firman, F., & Tola, B. (2008). The future of ICT in Indonesian education: Issues of planning and policy. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on e-Learning for Knowledge-Based Society.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hafis, M., Sahrawi, S., Putra, M. I. R., & Kurniawati, T. (2018). Pelatihan strategi belajar bahasa Inggris siswa kelas III SMP Walisongo dalam menghadapi ujian nasional 2018. Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. 2(2), 177
Hidayat, D. (2023). Pelatihan guru dan kesiapan sistem pendidikan dalam implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 14(1), 45–56.
Kemendikbud. (2021). Panduan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Masita, M. (2024). Challenges of implementing digital learning in rural schools in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi, 5(1), 22–31.
Maulida, L., & Mukminatien, N. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of differentiated instruction in Indonesian EFL classrooms. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(3), 796–812.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
Sari, D., & Widodo, H. (2022). Persepsi guru terhadap perubahan kurikulum dan implikasinya dalam praktik pembelajaran. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 112–123.
Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. Jossey-Bass.
Setyaningsih, R., & Indriani, L. (2018). Enhancing students’ engagement through creative media in English learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 15(2), 103–112.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2023). Technology integration in education: The role of digital pedagogy and teacher adaptability. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 305–320.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Yuniar, S., & Umami, L. (2023). Kendala implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di sekolah menengah: Studi kasus di daerah terpencil. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, 8(1), 67–78.
Zainuri, A. (2023). Kurikulum Prototipe sebagai alternatif pembelajaran masa depan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 15(3), 211–220.
